ISSN  1999-8864  (Online)
 

  最新卷期
Current Issue
  第一卷 第一期
Vol.1 No.1
  所有卷期
All Issues
  投稿須知
For Authors
 
第一卷 第一期 Volume 1 Number 1 [完整版 | Entire Version] 

創刊詞 藍順德
Inaugural Editorial Shun-Te Lan
 
主編的話 陳伯璋 甄曉蘭
Editors' Note Po-Chang Chen   Hsiao-Lan Chen
 
One-Guideline-One-Version Textbook Contention: A Critique and Analysis Yung-Sheng Ou
摘要 Abstract | 全文 PDF Full Text | 引註 How to Cite |
「一綱一本教科書事件」平議
摘要 Abstract

  臺北市政府於2006年底,宣布推動「北北基一綱一本、共辦基測」,引起了一綱一本與一綱多本的爭議,至今尚在延燒。本文從臺灣的社會歷史脈絡,及近十餘年教育改革的政治環境,探討其爭議焦點後發現,一本和多本的爭論成為政治的議題,國民黨藉此爭取選票,向民進黨政府爭奪教育、課程決策權,最後演變為「中國化教育」與「臺灣主體性教育」間的對決,甚至成為民進黨和國民黨間的政權保衛戰。本文主要在分析這些論點,並申述其在課程政策上的意涵。
  Toward the end of 2006 the Taipei City Government Department of Education announced its stance of “one-guideline-one-version policy for Taipei City, Taipei County, and Keelung” and joint sponsorship of basic skills achievement tests for junior high school students. The issue has become a source of contention between the one-guideline-one-version group in one camp versus the one-guideline-multiple-versions group in the other.
  By way of analysis of Taiwan’s social and historical developments and the political environments of educational reforms in the last ten-plus years, this paper has attempted to analyze the bone of this textbook policy contention. It was found that the so-called one-version vs. multiple-versions textbook policy is best analyzed from a political perspective. The Democratic Progressive Party (DDP) and the Kuomingtang Party (KMT) have vied intensively for control of constituent votes, especially in regard to education and curriculum policy. Specifically, the rivalry between the two political parties lies in “Chinese-ized education” versus “Taiwan subjectivity-oriented education.” In essence, the contention manifests a fierce struggle for power between the two political parties. This paper has served to analyze the intricate complexities entailed in this textbook version contention. It has also explicated the implications of the contention for curriculum policy making.
引註 APA Format
歐用生(2008)。「一綱一本教科書事件」平議。教科書研究1(1),1-28。
 
 
Is 'One-Guideline-One-Version' Policy a Panacea? —Reconceptualization of "Textbook" Shu-Ching Chou
摘要 Abstract | 全文 PDF Full Text | 引註 How to Cite |
豈是「一本」能了?──教科書概念的重建
摘要 Abstract

  國民中小學實施教科書審定制以來,一綱多本的政策被指為非但未達成原有的理想,反而徒生困擾。但細究諸多問題,原因多不出於審定制本身,而是審定制執行過程未臻完善,或是其他範疇問題的連帶歸咎。若試圖代之以一綱一本措施,則不僅未能解決問題,反而製造問題。之所以出現一本或多本的爭論,起因於大眾對教科書的內容及功能持「過時的」期望。學習原本即不應囿限於一本教科書裡;欲導引革新的課程與教學,教科書的概念應予重構。
  本文指出:1.現行型態的教科書應作為重要概念與學習訊息的索引,作為連結其他學習資源的起點,所以多種類的「學校用書」應當取代單一的「教科書」概念;2.教科書不是僅供學生閱讀的文本,而應是師生互動的中介;3.教科書應以多樣化的教材樣貌出現——它可以是網路學習資源、視聽媒材和各種工作單的組合。而這些多樣的教材卻能統合在教學者清晰的課程架構中,讓學習經驗既多元又有系統性。
  面對複雜多變的社會,一本教科書無法養成學生的真實能力。一本或多本的議題事實上是個無謂的爭論。
  The policy of one-guideline-multiple-versions is built on the principle of deregulation, the baseline of educational reform in Taiwan over the past decade, but it has been criticized since its implementation. However, the problems resulted from the implementation of the policy more than the policy itself. Under the Grades 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines, curriculum articulation and entrance exams are thought to be the main problems of the textbook policy. To solve these problems, Taipei county and Taipei city governments plan to implement a ‘one-version’ policy.
  There are plenty of arguments from different camps about textbook policy, but unless out-dated concepts about textbooks are revised, the debate will be pointless. This article first analyzes the positive and negative opinions of the one-guideline-multiple-versions policy, and points out some fallacies in ‘one-version’ policy, then argues for the reconceptualization of textbooks — textbooks could be various forms of school books, the textbook is not only the text for reading, and the textbook doesn’t have to be a traditional well-organized student book.
  How could one textbook guide students to know the fast-changing world or enhance the development of the student mind? Only when the concept of ‘textbook’ is revised, will the meaningless dispute about one or multiple versions end, and alternative textbooks developed.
引註 APA Format
周淑卿(2008)。豈是「一本」能了?──教科書概念的重建。教科書研究1(1),29-47。
 
 
The Price-Related Issues of Textbooks and Their Consequence in Taiwan
Li-Hua Chen   Tzeng-Lung Perng   Han-Yu Li
摘要 Abstract | 全文 PDF Full Text | 引註 How to Cite |
教科書價格相關議題評析及其後效例證
摘要 Abstract

  國內的國民中小學教科書市場全面開放民間審定版參與,迄今已逾10年。其間,爭議事件紛擾不斷,伴隨而生的後效也不少。本研究從搜集主要媒體10年來對於教科書開放的新聞報導出發,針對市場化後衍生與價格相關的議題,包括:教科書採購風紀議題,教科書業者聯合抵制議價議題,教科書業者營運危機議題,教科書業者協議不送作業簿遭受重罰議題等,分說情由,理出梗概,並做評析。再者,以訪談方式,探究教科書價格變化的後效,例如:家長負擔明顯減輕、業者改變營運方針、教科書品質降低、服務項目減少等,並舉例說明。最後,整理評析結果與後效例證,做出5點結論與7項建議,以玆參考。
  It has been over ten years since the textbook policy allowed private companies to publish textbooks (grades 1-9) in Taiwan. This study collected and reviewed newspaper reports on price-related issues of textbooks (grades 1-9) over the past ten years. By interviewing relevant persons on textbook development, price valuation and negotiation, this study also analyzed the consequences of price-related issues. Several conclusions and suggestions are proposed.
引註 APA Format
陳麗華、彭增龍、李涵鈺(2008)。教科書價格相關議題評析及其後效例證。教科書研究1(1),49-82。
 
 
Developing Technological Problem Solving Activities Based on a Functional Model Yu-Shan Chang
摘要 Abstract | 全文 PDF Full Text | 引註 How to Cite |
科技問題解決的教材設計──功能導向模式的應用
摘要 Abstract

  本文主要在分析國內外「生活科技」教科書中,科技問題解決的教材現況,並透過當前科技問題解決教學理論與研究取向,統整提出功能導向的科技問題解決教材設計模式,以及教材設計的實例,供作參考。本文經分析結果發現,國內外教科書採用線性科技問題解決模式為主;並未有學習鷹架的設計;雖有腦力激盪的過程,但少有創思技術的教學;不重視再設計再製作的創新歷程;綜合討論以結果的發表與欣賞為主,較少聚焦在經驗建構歷程。本文分析當前相關研究後,提出功能導向的科技問題解決模式,以界定問題、研究分析、規劃實作、測試評價、再設計等功能循環為核心,以建構學習、鷹架理論、及創意學習3者為教學重點,提出一個「水陸兩用載具設計」的教學實例,供教科書編寫與教材設計的參考。
  This paper aimed to develop technological problem solving activities from a functional model. After discussing technological problem solving activities in junior high school technology textbooks, the main findings were: (1)A linear model of technological problem solving often served as the basis for those activities; (2)Less use of scaffolding was made to support student learning; (3)Less creative thinking skills were taught; (4)The importance of redesign was not emphasized; (5)The class discussion focused little on experiences and processes of technological problem solving. Based on textbook analysis and literature reviews, a functional model of technological problem solving was proposed. Then an exemplar of technological problem solving activities was designed accordingly.
引註 APA Format
張玉山(2008)。科技問題解決的教材設計──功能導向模式的應用。教科書研究1(1),83-103。
 
 
The Analysis and Comparison of Punctuation Teaching Content in Grades 1-9 Curriculum Mandarin Textbook Yu-Hung Lin   Chia-Chun Lin
摘要 Abstract | 全文 PDF Full Text | 引註 How to Cite |
九年一貫國語教科書標點符號教材內容分析比較
摘要 Abstract

  標點符號是書面語中表情達意重要的符號,其更可以精彩文章內容的口氣與態度,將文句精確表達,完整文章的內容。因此,標點符號深深影響著閱讀與寫作,不容忽視。標點符號的基礎奠基於小學,小學教科書對於標點符號教學內容撰寫的優劣與用心程度,將可窺見學生學習成效,進而了解作文程度優劣之原因。本篇論文將針對康軒、南一、翰林3版本中的標點符號教學加以整理、分析,了解其優點與缺失,進而提出評論與建議,以期給予教科書編輯思考空間,提高學生學習成效與閱讀寫作能力。
  Punctuation is the expression of cordiality; that’s important in written language. It may express the tone of article as well as allow the expression to be more complete. Therefore, we can’t neglect the deep influence of punctuation on reading and writing. The foundation for punctuation is laid in the elementary school. How punctuation is taught in elementary school textbooks can have a great effect on student studies. This research will point of reorganizing and analyzing the three editions’ textbooks, then comprehending the advantages and disadvantages, that can’t only give some advice for textbooks’ editors, but improve the students’ studying effects, reading and writing abilities.
引註 APA Format
林于弘、林佳均(2008)。九年一貫國語教科書標點符號教材內容分析比較。教科書研究1(1),105-121。
 

書評 BOOK REVIEW
教科書政治學 林青萸
The Politics of the Textbook Althea Ching-Yu Lin
全文 PDF Full Text | 引註 How to Cite |
引註 APA Format
林青萸(2008)。教科書政治學。教科書研究1(1),123-128。
 

資料與統計 DATA and STATISTICS
高級中學及國民小學教科書審定統計
Statistics of Textbook Review and Approval
全文 PDF Full Text | 引註 How to Cite |
引註 APA Format
教科書審定統計(2008)。教科書研究1(1),129-133。
 
 

本刊投稿及編務事宜連絡,請函寄:10644臺北市大安區和平東路一段179號4樓,或E-mail:ej@mail.naer.edu.tw
 
Manuscripts and all editorial correspondence should be sent to:
4F, 179 Sec. 1, Heping E. Rd., Daan Dist., Taipei City 10644, Taiwan (R.O.C.), or E-mail:ej@mail.naer.edu.tw

Creative Commons License   Directory of Open Access Journals   EBSCO Education Research Complete    臺灣社會科學引文索引