第四卷 第二期 Volume 4 Number 2
|
[完整版 | Entire Version]
|
|
Editors' Note
Po-Chang Chen Hsiao-Lan Chen
|
|
The Wushe Incident in Social Studies Textbooks in Taiwan: A Multiple Perspective Analysis
Jung-Hua Tseng Wen-Chiu Chang
| 摘要 Abstract | 全文 PDF Full Text | 引註 How to Cite |
臺灣社會教科書中的霧社事件──從多元觀點分析
摘要 Abstract
本研究旨在從多元的觀點來分析臺灣社會教科書中的霧社事件。採內容分析作為研究方法,在研究信度與效度部分,本研究類目的擬定採取賽德克族、漢族、日本政府觀點的相關文獻,進而發展出本研究之分析類目,並請三位評分員,進行信度分析。在教科書取樣的部分,研究者選取國小五、六年級、國中一年級社會學習領域教科書以及高中一年級歷史教科書,一共38冊進行分析;在分析結果方面,探究社會教科書中霧社事件的呈現情形,以及探討教科書中的霧社事件在多元觀點中的啟示。研究結論有二:(1)教科書僅簡述霧社事件,無呈現完整事件的成因、經過與結果;(2)教科書中的霧社事件,多從漢人觀點出發,易造成學生建構出偏狹的知識。最後,提供教材編撰者,能以多元的觀點來設計與詮釋之建議。
This study mainly explores from a multicultural perspective the Wushe Incident as it is presented in social studies textbooks in Taiwan, using the content analysis as research method. In the study of reliability and validity, this study employed literature on Seediq, Han, Japanese government views to develop categories and invited three raters to analyze reliability. Researchers selected 38 books for analysis, including fifth and sixth-grade social studies textbooks, junior high social studies textbooks, and high school history textbooks. This study explored descriptions of the Wushe Incident in social studies textbook and revelations concerned with the Wushe Incident in social studies textbook using multiple perspective analysis. The following conclusions were reached (1) Descriptions of the Wushe Incident in textbooks were simple and failed to present the complete cause as well as the development and consequences of the incident (2) Descriptions of the Wushe Incident in textbooks were told from the viewpoint of Han and this can easily cause students to construct a narrow understanding of the event. Finally, based on the conclusions reached, the researchers provided suggestions for textbook editors.
引註 APA Format
曾榮華、張雯秋(2011)。臺灣社會教科書中的霧社事件──從多元觀點分析。教科書研究,4(2),1-23。
|
|
Formation of National Identity in Hong Kong SAR: A Discourse Analysis of Grade 1-9 Social Studies Textbooks
Li-Hua Chen Wen-Ting Wu
| 摘要 Abstract | 全文 PDF Full Text | 引註 How to Cite |
形塑香港特區的國家認同──中小學社會教科書之論述分析
摘要 Abstract
香港對國家認同的意識乃取決於當權政府之決策。在英治時期,港英政府對國家認同採取隱晦不談的態度,並以認同國際、認同香港來模糊國家認同的焦點;1997年香港回歸中國前後,對中國國家認同的意識浮現,乃至現今回歸中國14年來,在中國國族主義與愛國主義的號召下,香港特區當局有目的地透過中小學課程形塑公民對中國的國家認同。
本研究旨在探討香港回歸中國後,其中小學社會教科書中形塑什麼及如何形塑國家認同。本研究於小學階段選用《小學常識》教科書,於初中階段(中一至中三)選用《繽紛社會教育》,以此二套社會教科書做為論述分析之對象,本文將其中涉及國家認同之論述由鉅觀至微觀逐一梳理與細究。研究分析結果獲致以下主要發現:
- 一、直接宣示香港法定的國家認同,以《基本法》與「一國兩制」為準則。
- 二、強化香港的文化中國認同,訴諸親情譬喻、民族榮耀、歷史仇恨與中華文化之連結。
- 三、通過「背靠祖國,面向世界」之經濟利益的連帶關係,進一步強化國家認同。
- 四、香港的國家認同仍保有在地認同成分,及由此延伸的國際關懷特色。
The awareness of national identity in Hong Kong has been determined by policies of government authorities. Hong Kong authorities under British rule replaced national identity by promoting international identity and Hong Kong’s own local identity. During the transition of Hong Kong to Chinese control, national identity toward China gradually increased. It has been 14 years since the 1997 handover, now, with the call for Chinese nationalism and patriotism, the Hong Kong government is trying to construct Chinese national identity ins chool curriculum.
This paper explores the formation of national identity in Hong Kong’s 1–9 grade social studies textbooks. Textbooks entitled “General Studies” (grade 1–6) and “Thriving Social Education” (grade 7–9) were reviewed using the discourse analysis method. Conclusions reached are as follows:
-
The textbooks directly claim that the Chinese national identity of Hong Kong citizens is legally based on the policy of “one country, two systems” and “the Hong Kong Basic Law”.
- The textbooks bolster apolitical and cultural identity toward China by making connections to kinship metaphors, national achievements, historical hatreds, and Chinese culture.
- The textbooks straighten further national identity using the slogan “Face the world with the motherland at your back” underscoring mutual ties of economic interests between Mainland China and Hong Kong.
- Hong Kong’s national identity continues to feature local identity which extends to care for the world.
引註 APA Format
陳麗華、吳雯婷(2011)。形塑香港特區的國家認同──中小學社會教科書之論述分析。教科書研究,4(2),25-59。
|
|
Discussion on the Application of Historical Illustrations in Textbooks from the Perspective of the Art of Teaching
Tao-Yuan Huang
| 摘要 Abstract | 全文 PDF Full Text | 引註 How to Cite |
從教學的藝術性談教科書的歷史圖像應用
摘要 Abstract
無論在西方或臺灣皆有研究指出,教育現場多以科學化取向控制教學過程與評量,所以要展現教學的藝術性有其困難,本文即以此問題為反省的出發點,主要採文獻分析的方式,擬以「教學的藝術性」、「圖像教材」兩個主軸進行論述。首先,透過相關資料的爬梳,彙整出三個教學的藝術性,分別是:(1)持有「教學即藝術」的教學信念;(2)善用問題進行理性兼感性的教學;(3)營造具想像力的教學情境;其次,在圖像教材部分,將順應第一部分的討論為脈絡,主張教師應利用實務知識,轉化理論運用於教學現場,故利用現行國小教科書(翰林版)臺灣史的圖像教材,說明圖像應用時的藝術性實踐方式。
Research in both Taiwan and the West indicates that teaching processes and evaluation in most venues of education are controlled scientifically, making it difficult for teachers to develop their own art of teaching. This paper takes this problem as a starting point and employs literature analysis to study the art of teaching and image materials.
Three aspects of the art of teaching are considered—
(1)Maintaining faith in teaching as art.
(2)Employing questions to realize teaching characterized by rationality and sensibility.
(3)Creating teaching scenarios conducive to imagination.
As to image materials, it is suggested that teachers use practical knowledge and transform it into theories to be employed in teaching venues. Image materials in Taiwan history textbooks (the Han-Lin Version) currently used in elementary schools are utilized to illustrate the art and application of employing images.
引註 APA Format
黃道遠(2011)。從教學的藝術性談教科書的歷史圖像應用。教科書研究,4(2),61-85。
|
|
Cross Disciplinary Thinking or Noisy Distraction? The Significance of Transformative Teaching and Its Application in Language Arts and History
Shu-Hua Tang
| 摘要 Abstract | 全文 PDF Full Text | 引註 How to Cite |
眾聲喧嘩?跨界思維?──論「教學轉化」的意涵及其在文史科目教學上的應用
摘要 Abstract
本文嘗試梳理出「教學轉化」一詞的意涵,首先從「轉化」一詞的字源學下手,再談其在各學門領域內的使用情形,最後則回到教育領域文獻,以探討其在教學上的意涵。本文企圖透過跨界思維,歸納整理出兩層面的「教學轉化」原則,第一層面轉化工作主要是老師針對教材內容進行個人層面的轉化,以使自己的視域與作者的視域交融;第二層面轉化工作則在協助學生克服時空的限制,尤其應善用教材與教法層面的輔助,以幫助學生達到經驗上的轉化。本文並提出個人曾在中小學研究之發現,供文史科目老師教學參考之用。
This paper attempts to tease out the many meanings of the term “transformation in teaching.” First, the author studied dictionary usages, then reviewed literature in various disciplines, and finally examined what the term means in the field of education. Cross disciplinary thinking suggests that the broad meaning of this term is a principle that consists of two basic levels. The first is a personal level in which the perspectives of instructor and textbook editor are brought together. The second is a pedagogical level in which effective teaching methods are developed to transform students’ experiences. The author applies these principles to the teaching of language arts and history as reference material for teachers.
引註 APA Format
唐淑華(2011)。眾聲喧嘩?跨界思維?──論「教學轉化」的意涵及其在文史科目教學上的應用。教科書研究,4(2),87-120。
|
|
Workshops on Analytical Approaches for Textbook Research
Pei-Hsuan Chen
|
|
Peace Education
Chun-Wen Lin
|
|
Statistics of Textbook Review and Approval
|
|
本刊投稿及編務事宜連絡,請函寄:10644臺北市大安區和平東路一段17
9號4樓,或E-mail:
ej@mail.naer.edu.tw
Manuscripts and all editorial correspondence should be sent to:
4F, 179 Sec. 1, Heping E. Rd., Daan Dist., Taipei City 10644, Taiwan (R.O.C.), or E-mail:
ej@mail.naer.edu.tw